Logo
Home/Research & Insights/The Quiet Digitisation of Global Capital Markets
Article

The Quiet Digitisation of Global Capital Markets

decorationApril 10, 2026
Mohammed Carrim Ganey
Web3
The Quiet Digitisation of Global Capital Markets
decorationdecoration

Tokenised US Treasuries crossed $13.44 billion this week. Nobody in the mainstream financial press has written the actual headline.

This isn't a DeFi story. It isn't even a Web3 story, not really. It's the most significant structural change to how sovereign debt moves since the US Treasury shifted from physical certificates to book-entry form in the 1970s. And it's happening so quietly that most people building careers around capital markets have no idea it's underway.

I've been watching this build for two years. We've been backing settlement infrastructure at Aweh Ventures since 2024, and what I'm seeing now tells me the acceleration phase has started.

The Problem Nobody Is Framing Correctly

Most of the coverage treats tokenised treasuries as a yield product. Park your stablecoins, earn 3-4% on US government debt, done. That's not wrong, but it misses the architecture underneath.

The repo market is where this gets interesting. Global repo, for those unfamiliar, is the plumbing of capital markets: overnight and short-term borrowing backed by government securities, with around $10 trillion in daily turnover according to Bank for International Settlements estimates. Pension funds use it. Central banks use it. Every major sovereign wealth fund on the planet cycles through repo daily. It is, without overstating it, the heartbeat of the global financial system.

And it is settling on-chain.

JPMorgan's Onyx platform processed its first blockchain repo in 2020. By 2023, it had cleared over $1 trillion in cumulative intraday repo volume using tokenised collateral. Goldman Sachs, Citi, and BNY Mellon are all running similar pilots. Broadridge's Distributed Ledger Repo (DLR) system, which launched with BNP Paribas and Société Générale, has moved from test to live. These aren't innovation labs producing slide decks. They are production systems moving real money.

But here's what the coverage consistently misses: the tokenisation of the collateral itself is the harder, slower, more consequential piece. Getting repo settlement onto a blockchain is clever engineering. Getting the actual Treasury bills onto-chain as programmable, composable assets, that's the structural shift.

The Evidence

The numbers from rwa.xyz as of 10 April 2026 are worth sitting with.

Total tokenised US Treasury value: $13.44 billion. Seventy-four distinct products. Just under 61,000 holders. A 7-day APY of 3.44%, tracking the underlying yield on short-duration US government paper almost exactly.

The growth breakdown by platform tells the real story. Circle's USYC product holds $2.7 billion, up 25.9% in 30 days. Ondo Finance has $2.6 billion across eight products, up 23.57%. Securitize, which manages BlackRock's BUIDL fund, sits at $2.4 billion, up 17.79%. Centrifuge, a platform doing more structural work than most people track, holds $1.3 billion, up 109.3% in a single month.

Read that last number again. 109%. In 30 days.

Centrifuge isn't a yield-wrapper. In February 2026, it deployed a $100 million JAAA (CLO AAA tranche) strategy directly onto Aave's institutional lending product. In March 2026, LayerZero partnered with Centrifuge specifically to advance cross-chain institutional tokenisation. This is institutional-grade fixed income infrastructure being built in public.

Franklin Templeton's Benji Investments fund, one of the earliest and most serious entries in this space, holds $1 billion. Franklin isn't a crypto-native operator. They are an 80-year-old asset manager running a registered money market fund on a public blockchain. That detail should stop every sceptic cold.

The point is: this isn't ten projects experimenting. It's 74 products across multiple chains, managed by a mix of TradFi giants and crypto-native protocols, holding $13.44 billion in US government debt. And that figure was $9.8 billion in early March 2026.

Thirty percent growth in a month. Against a backdrop where global equity markets are in distress.

The correlation is not coincidental.

Why the 1970s Comparison Matters

In the 1970s, the US Treasury began migrating from physical bond certificates to book-entry form. Before that change, moving sovereign debt required physical delivery: certificates changing hands, clearing houses managing enormous paper-based operations, settlement windows of weeks. The book-entry system compressed that to T+1. It made the modern repo market possible. It created the infrastructure that allowed bond markets to scale to the tens of trillions they now represent.

That was a structural change. It didn't change what a Treasury was. It changed how it moved.

Tokenisation is the same thing again. A tokenised Treasury is still a claim on US government debt. But it settles in seconds, not days. It can be used as collateral in smart contracts without needing a custodian to make a phone call. It can be fractionalised, transferred across borders at 2am on a Sunday, and composed with other financial instruments in ways that the existing settlement infrastructure physically cannot support.

I spent years in crypto mining and building Curate, a cross-chain NFT marketplace. The thing I learned, the real lesson, is that infrastructure changes don't announce themselves. They accrete quietly until one day the old rails just aren't being used anymore. The book-entry transition didn't eliminate physical certificates overnight. It made them irrelevant. Over a decade.

We are in that phase now for sovereign debt.

Where This Goes

We believe the tokenised treasury market crosses $100 billion before the end of 2027. I want to be transparent about how I get to that number.

The $13.44 billion figure sits against a US Treasury market of roughly $27 trillion. The tokenised share is under 0.05%. That's not a small base, it's early signal. The 30-day growth rate of 30% suggests this market is in the same phase DeFi TVL was in mid-2020, growing fast from a small base with structural tailwinds, not retail speculation, driving it.

The structural tailwinds are: Basel III capital requirements pushing banks toward higher-quality, more liquid collateral, which tokenised Treasuries provide with better settlement efficiency; growing demand from Asian and Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds for dollar-denominated assets accessible without US correspondent banking relationships; and the emergence of programmable collateral that DeFi protocols can use without the custodial overhead that has historically excluded TradFi paper from on-chain finance.

The most interesting indicator to watch isn't TVL. It's the ratio of tokenised Treasuries being used as active collateral in DeFi versus being held as yield-earning positions. Right now, most of the $13.44 billion is sitting static, earning yield. As protocols like Aave Horizon, Morpho, and Centrifuge make it composable, the active collateral share grows. When that ratio shifts past 40%, the velocity of this market increases dramatically. That's when the $100 billion becomes a conservative estimate.

Centrifuge's 109% monthly growth suggests that shift is starting.

The Regulatory Piece

I should address the obvious objection: regulation will slow this down.

We believe the opposite is true. And the reasoning is straightforward. Every major regulator dealing with tokenised treasuries is looking at products backed by US government debt, administered by registered investment advisers (Franklin Templeton, Securitize, Superstate are all regulated entities), and settling on public blockchains with full on-chain auditability. This is not an unregistered token offering backed by a whitepaper. It's a money market fund with better transparency than its TradFi equivalent.

The SEC's engagement with tokenised securities has been cautious but not hostile. The CFTC has indicated that on-chain collateral for derivatives markets is a priority use case. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority published its Technology Working Group analysis in 2025 specifically examining tokenised government bond settlement. None of these bodies are trying to stop this. They're trying to write the rules before they get left behind.

That's a different posture than 2019. And it matters.

What Smart Capital Is Doing

I've spoken to a number of family office investors in London over the last six months. The conversations have changed. Two years ago, tokenised treasuries were a "we'll watch this" category. Today, several are using USYC or OUSG (Ondo's flagship product) as part of their cash management stack, specifically because the settlement speed and composability fit their operational requirements better than a standard treasury money market fund.

That's not a thesis. That's a live product decision by sophisticated capital allocators.

The smarter move is looking at where the infrastructure plays are. The platforms that tokenise assets: Securitize, Centrifuge, Ondo, Franklin Templeton Benji. The protocols that make tokenised paper composable: Aave Horizon, Morpho, Superstate's OpenEden rails. The settlement infrastructure underneath all of it: the chains handling the bulk of volume (Ethereum, Stellar, and Base are the primary networks in the rwa.xyz data right now).

This is where the long-term value accretes. Not the yield, but the rails.

The Bet

Fifteen trillion dollars in sovereign debt changes hands every week through repo markets, primary dealers, and secondary clearing. Settlement infrastructure earns basis points on every transfer, and right now those basis points go to DTCC, Euroclear, Clearstream, and a handful of custodians that have operated as essential oligopolies for 50 years.

On-chain settlement doesn't need their infrastructure. Programmable collateral doesn't need their phone calls. The tokenised treasury market at $13.44 billion is a rounding error against the total addressable market. But a rounding error growing at 30% per month has a habit of becoming the main line item.

The 1970s shift to book-entry took a decade to fully play out. This one will move faster. The infrastructure is already built. The institutions are already in it. The products already exist.

The question isn't whether this happens.

It's whether you're positioned before the mainstream financial press figures out what the headline actually is.

arrowBack to Research & Insights

Interested in learning more about our research and investment strategies?

Contact UsIcon